Design of shear walls for lateral loads

How does Skylark deal with lateral loads?

Skylark walls are the main structural elements resisting lateral loads such as earthquakes and wind. The structural checks need to verify the following:

  • That the wall is stiff enough to limit the inter-storey lateral deformation within code limits.
  • That the wall is strong enough to resits lateral loads.

The key parameters governing the performance of the walls are:

  • Aspect ratio of the wall, e.g., squatter walls are stronger and stiffer than slender ones.
  • Strength and stiffness of the bow ties.

A design example according to the Eurocodes is reported below.

Worked example

A Skylark wall made by four S columns and two S corners is subjected to lateral load equal to \(F_{SLS}\) = 40kN at the Serviceability Limit State, and to lateral load equal to \(F_{ULS}\) = 60kN at the UltimateLimit State. Verify that the wall satisfies the design criteria according to the Eurocodes.

Geometry

A drawing of a 2936 mm wide and 2100 mm high wall, subjected to a distributed vertical load equal to 0.5 kN/m. There are 14 bow ties on each side providing shear capacity and moment capacity. A bowtie connector is also illustrated. Its dimensions are 90mm at the widest point and 55.7mm at the narrowest.

The wall is 2936 mm wide and 2100 mm high, and subjected to a distributed vertical load equal to 0.5 kN/m. There are 14 bow ties on each side providing shear capacity and moment capacity. The shear stiffness and tensile stiffness of one bow tie are equal to \(k_s=3kN/mm\) and \(k_t=1.5kN/mm\), respectively.

The elements are made of \(w=18 mm\) thick plywood sheets. Material properties are reported in the table below.

Parameter Value Unit Description
E 8000 MPa Elastic modulus
G 350 MPa Shear modulus
\(f_{c,0}\) 20 MPa Compressive strength (main direction)
\(f_{t,0}\) 12 MPa Tensile strength (main direction)
\(f_{c,90}\) 10 MPa Compressive strength (weak direction)
\(f_{t,90}\) 6 MPa Tensile strength (weak direction)
\(f_s\) 3.5 MPa Shear strength

Serviceability Limit State (SLS)

The SLS is verified if the lateral displacement of the wall \(\Delta_{tot}\) subjected to the lateral load  \(F_{SLS}\) is less than \(\frac{h}{300}\) =7 mm.

The total displacement \(\Delta_{tot}\) is equal to:


\(\Delta_{tot}=\underbrace{\Delta_T}_{Translation}+\underbrace{\Delta_S}_{Shear}+\underbrace{\Delta_R}_{Rocking}\)

Images of 3 walls illustrating deformation mechanisms: translation, shear and rocking.
Deformation mechanisms

The term \(\Delta_T\) can be calculated as:


\(\Delta_T=\frac{F}{2nk_s}\)


where \(n\) is the number of bow ties and \(k_s\) the shear stiffness of the bow ties. The factor 2 appears because bow ties are placed on both faces of the wall. Hence:

\( \Delta_T=\frac{\overbrace{F}^{40}}{2\underbrace{n}_{14}\underbrace{k_s}}_3=0.48\ mm\)


The term \(\Delta_S\) can be calculated as:


\(\Delta_S=\frac{Fh}{GA_s}=\frac{Fh}{2Gwt}\)


where \(G\) is the shear modulus and \(A_s=2wt\) is the shear area. Hence:

 \(\Delta_S=\frac{\overbrace{Fh}^{40000\cdot2100}}{2\underbrace{Gwt}_{350 \cdot 2936 \cdot 18}}=2.27 \ mm\)

The term \(\Delta_R\) can be calculated as:


\(\Delta_R=\frac{Fh-\frac{qw^2}{2}}{2k_t\sum_1^{n} d_i^2}\cdot h\)


where \(k_t\) is the tensile stiffness on the bow tie, and \(d_i\) the distance of each bow tie from the wall edge. Hence:

\(\Delta_R=\frac{\overbrace{Fh}^{40000\cdot2100}-\frac{\overbrace{qw^2}^{0.5\cdot2936^2}}{2}}{2\underbrace{k_t}_{1.5\cdot 10^3}\underbrace{\sum_1^{n_h} d_i^2}_{39.5 \cdot10^6}}\cdot \overbrace{h}^{2100}=1.45\ mm\)

Therefore:

\(\Delta_{tot}=4.2 \ mm \le 7 \ mm \ \checkmark\)

A spreadsheet with the calculations is available here.

Ultimate Limit State (ULS)

The capacity \(C\) of the wall is the minimum between the  horizontal shear capacity \(F_H\) and the overturning capacity \(F_R\):

\(C=min(F_R,F_H)\)


The term \(F_S\) can be calculated as:


\( F_S=2nS\)

where \(S\) is the shear capacity of the bow tie. The factor 2 appears because there are \(n\) bow ties on each face of the wall.


The term \(F_R\) can be calculated as:

\(F_R= \left( \frac{2\sum_1^{n}d_i^2}{d_n}T+  \frac{qw^2}{2} \right) \cdot \frac{1}{h}\)

where \(T\) is the tensile capacity of the bow tie.

Capacity of the bow tie

The tensile capacity of one bow tie \(T\) is calculated as the minimum force between the tension failure \(T_t\) and the compression/shear failure \(T_c\).

Drawings of 2 bowie connectors, using arrows to illustrate the structural failure mechanisms.
Bow tie failure mechanisms

\(T_t\) can be calculated as:

\(T_t=\underbrace{f_{t,0} A_t}_{12\cdot 55.7 \cdot18}=12\ kN
\)

The calculation of \(T_c\) requires the following iterative process:
     1. Select an arbitrary \(T_c\), for example 1 kN.

  1. Calculate the bow tie slip \(s=\frac{F_2}{k_t}\) where \(k_t\) is the bow tie stiffness in tension.
  2. Calculate the contact zone between the bow tie and the panel considering the bow tie slip.
  3. Decompose \(T_c\) into \(T_{c,comp}\) (compression force) and \(T_{c,shear}\)  (shear) on the contact zone.
  4. Calculate the compression stress \(\sigma_C\) and \(\tau_S\) by considering the contact area.
  5. Check if  the element has failed according to \(\frac{\sigma_c}{f_{c,d}}+\frac{\tau_s}{f_s}=1\). If not, increased \(T_c\) until failure.

The iterative calculations are reported in the spreadsheet here. The "goal seek" function was used.

This leads to \(T=5.2 kN\). By considering \(k_{mod}=1.1\) (load duration factor for instantaneous events), this leads to \(T=5.7 kN\).

The shear capacity \(S\) of a bow tie is equal to:


\(S=\underbrace{A_s}_{55.7 \cdot 18}\overbrace{f_s}^{3.5}=3.5\ kN
\)

By considering \(k_{mod}=1.1\) (load duration factor for instantaneous events), this leads to \(S=3.85 kN\).

Capacity of the wall

The shear capacity of the wall can be calculated as:


\(F_S=2nS=107.8\ kN\)

Considering a safety coefficient equal to 1.2 leads to \(F_S=89.8 kN\).

The rocking capacity \(F_R\) is equal to:


\(F_R= \left( \frac{2\overbrace{\sum_1^{n}d_i^2}^{39.5\cdot 10^6}}{\underbrace{d_n}_{2802}}\underbrace{T}_{5700}+  \overbrace{\frac{qw^2}{2}}^{0.5 \cdot 2936^2} \right) \cdot \underbrace{\frac{1}{h}}_{2100}=77.5\ kN\)


Considering a safety coefficient equal to 1.2 leads to \(F_R=64.6 kN\).
Therefore:


\(C=min(F_S,F_R)=min(89.8,64.6)=64.6\ kN \ge 60\ kN\ \checkmark
\)

Finite element model

An elastic finite element model was developed in Karamba3D to check the results. The wall was modelled by using a shell element with thickness equal to 36 mm. Bow tie couples (one each side) were modelled with a single elastic spring having \(k_t=\ 3kN/mm\) and \(k_s=6\ kN/mm\), i.e., double the value of a single bow tie. The model is available here for download.

Screenshot of wall modelled to show a lateral load of 40 kN. The wall lifts up as a result.

The wall was subjected to a lateral load equal to 40 kN . It can be seen that the force \(T_{14}\) in the \(14^{th}\) bow tie couple is equal to \(T_n=5.85\ kN\). This leads to a vertical uplift equal to:


\(\Delta_n=\frac{\overbrace{T_n}^{5.85}}{\underbrace{k_t}_{3}}=1.95\ mm\)

Hence:
\( \Delta_R=\frac{\overbrace{\Delta_n}^{1.95}}{\underbrace{d_n}_{2802}} \cdot \overbrace{h}^{2100}=1.46\ mm \)

which is very close (0.01 mm) to the value reported by the analytical model.

For a lateral load equal to \(77.5 kN\), it can be seen that the force in the \(14^{th}\) bow tie couple is equal to \(2T=11.5kN\). This leads to a force \(T=5.75\) which is only 0.05 kN different from the values calculated by using the analytical model.

Screenshot of wall modelled to show a lateral load of 77.5 kN. The wall lifts up as a result.

Please do

A tick mark. Means yes, you can do this.

Use it

Most WikiHouse files and information are licensed under a Creative Commons–Sharealike licence, so you are free to use, distribute or modify them, including commercially.

A tick mark. Means yes, you can do this.

Check it

All WikiHouse information is shared 'as is', without warranties or guarantees of any kind. You are responsible for checking it and using it in a safe and responsible way, for example, getting it checked by a structural engineer.

A tick mark. Means yes, you can do this.

Comply with regulations

You are responsible for making sure your project complies with all relevant local regulations, including planning, building codes and health & safety legislation. If in doubt, seek professional advice.

A tick mark. Means yes, you can do this.

Re-share your improvements

If you make any improvements to the system, you must publish your files under the same type of open licence. However, you do not need to publish the plans and specifications for individual projects unless you wish to.

Please do not

A cross. Means no, you can't do this.

Call yourself WikiHouse

Do not call your company, organisation or any marketed product or service 'WikiHouse'. However, you may use the term WikiHouse to talk about the system, and you may describe your project, product, service or organisation as, for example, "using WikiHouse", "based on WikiHouse", "contributing to WikiHouse", or similar.

A cross. Means no, you can't do this.

Remove notices

Do not remove any licence notices from files if you are re-sharing them.

A cross. Means no, you can't do this.

Claim to be endorsed

Do not give the impression that you are endorsed by, or affiliated with WikiHouse or Open Systems Lab (unless you are, by written agreement), and do not claim to represent the WikiHouse project or community as a whole.